{"id":4622,"date":"2016-07-30T17:33:26","date_gmt":"2016-07-30T17:33:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/iarpp.net\/?post_type=article&p=4622"},"modified":"2016-08-01T18:05:13","modified_gmt":"2016-08-01T18:05:13","slug":"article-announcements","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Announcements"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

Janine de Peyer
\n<\/a>Tom Wooldridge
\n<\/a>Stanley Stern
\n<\/a>Andrew Samuels
\n<\/a>Jill Gentile
\n<\/a>Michael Eigen<\/a><\/h6>\n

<\/a>By Janine de Peyer<\/strong> (USA)<\/p>\n

Uncanny Communication and the Porous Mind<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Psychoanalytic Dialogues<\/em>, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 156-174, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

In this paper I examine the phenomenon of \u201cuncanny\u201d unconscious communication and the\u00a0plausibility of \u201ctelepathic\u201d interconnectivity between patient and therapist. While reexamining\u00a0longstanding psychoanalytic reluctance to engage with the topic of the \u201cuncanny,\u201d I present clinical\u00a0examples of seeming anomalous transmission, followed by discussion from contrasting perspectives\u00a0of psychoanalysis, neuroscience, quantum physics, and parapsychology. The patient\u2019s\u00a0and analyst\u2019s reactions to these uncanny moments are explored, along with the potential clinical\u00a0value of nurturing receptivity to this \u201cfrequency\u201d of unconscious attunement.<\/p>\n

Link:\u00a0<\/strong>http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/10481885.2016.1144978<\/a><\/p>\n

“Presence” and “Absence”:
\nKaleidoscopic Hide and Seek: Reply to Commentaries<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Psychoanalytic Dialogues<\/em>, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 198-205, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

In this reply I respond to Cambray\u2019s introduction of the \u201cself-organizing\u201d and \u201cemergent\u201d qualities\u00a0of telepathic communication, looking more closely at the relationship between dissociation\u00a0and the emergence of telepathic phenomena. I highlight the creative aspect of such telepathic\u00a0\u201cintrusions,\u201d viewing the clinician\u2019s capacity for intuitive imagination as key to the emergence of\u00a0telepathic material.<\/p>\n

In response to Eshel\u2019s connection between the analyst\u2019s \u201cpresence,\u201d \u201cabsence,\u201d\u00a0and the patient\u2019s unmet need for recognition, I examine the roles of co-construction and\u00a0mutual dissociation in transference\/countertransference enactments that generate uncanny phenomena.\u00a0Verbal interpretation not always being the most viable mode of communication, \u201cabsence\u201d\u00a0can sometimes serve as a co-constructed, unconscious \u201csolution\u201d to the problem of multiple\u00a0conflicting needs, holding a space for telepathic emergence to express the inexpressible.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong>\u00a0http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/10481885.2016.1144982<\/a><\/p>\n

\"depeyerphoto0616w\"Janine de Peyer<\/strong>, LCSW
\nEmail Janine dePeyer<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"eNews-div-lineNlogo\"Back to Top…<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>By Tom Wooldridge<\/strong> (USA)<\/p>\n

Including the Excluded:
\nMales and Gender Minorities in Eating Disorder Prevention <\/strong><\/h2>\n

By Cohn, L., Murray, S.,\u00a0Wooldridge,\u00a0<\/strong>T., & Walen, A., in Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention,\u00a0Vol. 24, No. 1, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

By operating under the outdated premise that eating disorders predominantly affect females, prevention efforts have been disproportionately aimed at girls and young women. This article shows how one-sided the research and program development have been, and present recommendations for how to expand curricula and policy to be more gender inclusive. Ultimately, eating disorders and related issues (e.g., body image dissatisfaction, obesity, comorbid conditions, weight prejudice, etc.) cannot be expected to decrease unless everyone is involved, regardless of gender. We wouldn\u2019t only inoculate girls for measles; preventing eating disorders across the board is the only fully effective approach.<\/p>\n

Link: <\/strong>http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/10640266.2015.1118958?journalCode=uedi20<\/a><\/p>\n

Go Big or Go Home:
\nA Thematic Content Analysis of Pro-muscularity Websites<\/strong><\/h2>\n

By Murray, S.B., Griffiths, S., Hazery, L., Shen, T.,\u00a0Wooldridge, T. & Mond, J.M., in Body Image, Vol. 16,\u00a0p. 17 \u2013 20, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

Existing content analyses of pro-eating disorder web content have focused on thinness-oriented eating disorder pathology. With the increasing prevalence of muscularity-oriented body image concerns, we conducted a systematic content analysis of 421 active pro-muscularity websites including static content websites, blogs, and online forums. Emergent coding methods were utilized (Cohen\u2019s kappa range = .78\u2013.88), and eight distinct thematic categories were identified: rigid dietary practices (26.2%), rigid exercise rules (18.4%), the broader benefits of muscularity (16.1%), the encouragement of the drive for size (15.9%), the labeling of the non-ideal body (11.4%), marginalizing other areas of life (6.1%), muscle enhancing substances (3.3%), and minimizing medical risk (2.6%). Pro-muscularity websites provide explicit material surrounding potentially non-healthful muscularity-oriented eating and exercise practices. Clinician awareness of the potentially non-healthful behaviors involved in the pursuit of muscularity may enhance the detection and treatment of male eating disorders in particular.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/26523689<\/a><\/p>\n

Macho, Bravado, and Eating Disorders:
\nSpecial Issues in Diagnosing and Treating Men<\/strong><\/h2>\n

By Wooldridge<\/em>, T. & Lemberg, R., in Psychiatric Times, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

Link: <\/strong>http:\/\/www.psychiatrictimes.com\/special-reports\/macho-bravado-and-eating-disorders-men-special-issues-diagnosis-and-treatment<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0\"wooldridgephoto0616w\"Tom Wooldridge<\/strong>, PsyD
\n<\/strong>Chair, Department of Psychology
\nNagel T. Miner Research Professor
\nGolden Gate University
\n536 Mission Street
\nSan Francisco, CA 94105 USA
\nEmail Tom Wooldridge<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"eNews-div-lineNlogo\"Back to Top…<\/a><\/p>\n

Enactments in Psychoanalysis: Therapeutic Benefits<\/strong><\/h2>\n

<\/a>By Stanley Stern <\/strong>(USA)<\/p>\n

Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 281-303, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

In this article the therapeutic benefits of enactments are addressed. Relevant literature reveals disparate conceptions about the nature and use of enactments. Clarification of the term is discussed. This analyst’s theoretical and technical evolution is addressed; it is inextricably related to using enactments. How can it not be? A taxonomy of enactments is presented. The article considers that enactments may be fundamental in the evolution from orthodox to contemporary analytic technique. Assumptions underlying enactments are explored, as are guidelines for using enactments. Finally, the article posits that enactments have widened the scope of analysis and contributed to its vitality.<\/p>\n

Stanley Stern, MD <\/strong>served as a Training and Supervising Analyst for the Southern California Psychoanalytic Institute and is a member of the New Center for Psychoanalysis, The Southwest Arizona Psychoanalytic Society, and the Arizona Psychoanalytic Society. He practices in Phoenix, AZ. He is also a member of the American Psychoanalytic Association and The International Association of Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.<\/p>\n

Link<\/strong>: http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/27200466<\/a><\/p>\n

\"sternphoto0616w\"Stanley Stern<\/strong>, MD
\n<\/strong>3104 E. Camelback Rd., No. 601
\nPhoenix, AZ 85016\u00a0\u00a0 USA
\nEmail Stanley Stern<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"eNews-div-lineNlogo\"Back to Top…<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

By Andrew Samuels <\/strong>(UK)<\/p>\n

“I rebel, therefore we are” (Albert Camus): New Political Thinking on Individual Responsibility for Group, Society, Culture, and Planet<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Transactional Analysis Journal<\/em>, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 101-108, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article is an attempt to open discussion on the role of the individual, as opposed to the group, in contemporary progressive and radical politics. The phrase making a difference<\/em> comes to mind. Academic ideas about the contexts and groups in which individuals operate are important yet require extensive revision. Jung\u2019s ideas about the relationship of individuals and the social collective are useful as is Camus\u2019 (1951\/1953) book The Rebel<\/em>. This article presents new thinking about individuals as fractured and broken as distinct from the autonomous unit promulgated by neoliberal thinking. Yet they remain individuals.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/tax.sagepub.com\/content\/46\/2\/101.abstract<\/a><\/p>\n

Relational Approaches to Social and Political Issues: Andrew Samuels Interviewed by Tom Warnecke <\/strong><\/h2>\n

By Samuels, A. & Warnecke, T. in Psychotherapy and Politics International. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002\/ppi.1377, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article derives from an interview originally conducted for a webinar on relational psychotherapy. The focus is on relational approaches to political and social issues. The possibilities and limitations of such approaches are discussed in the interview. Attention is paid to ecopsychology and also to the interweave between personal experience and societal dynamics. The ways in which the political is still marginalized in psychotherapy is explored. Ideas about how to work directly in the session with clinical material that is political in nature are introduced. Specific attention is paid to situations where the therapist might be repelled by the viewpoints of the client.<\/p>\n

Link: <\/strong>http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ppi.1377\/abstract<\/a><\/p>\n

Politische und klinische Entwicklungen in der Analytischen Psychologie 1772-2014: Subjektivit\u00e4t, Ebenburgtigkeit und Diversit\u00e4t Innerhalb und Ausserhalb des Behandlungsraums <\/strong><\/h2>\n

Analytische Psychologie: Zeitschrift fur Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse, <\/em>Heft 181, 46. Jg., 3\/2015, 284-309, 2015.<\/em><\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.brandes-apsel-verlag.de\/cgi-bin\/germinal_shop.exe\/VOLL?session_id=0434CF37-2161-42F3-90FB-3CFDD0808EF0&titel_id=8380981&titel_nummer=8380981&caller=brap&backpage=brap_topliste_zs.html&verlag=83<\/a><\/p>\n

John Forrester – Reminiscences<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Self and Society<\/em>, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/03060497.2016.1155867<\/a><\/p>\n

\"samuelsphoto0616w\"Andrew Samuels, DHL<\/strong>
\nEmail Andrew Samuels<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"eNews-div-lineNlogo\"Back to Top…<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

By Jill Gentile<\/strong> (USA)<\/p>\n

On Spatial Metaphors and Free Association:
\nPhallic Fantasy and Vaginal Primacy <\/strong><\/h2>\n

Contemporary Psychoanalysis<\/em>, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article ponders the growing appreciation for, and ubiquity of, metaphors of space in contemporary psychoanalytic thought and suggests that these metaphors might be understood as feminine signifiers. Psychoanalysis has historically privileged the phallic symbol, while keeping a feminine one obscured and unnamed. It is only by recognizing the sexual \u201csomethingness\u201d of vaginal space that we appreciate how vital it is to phallic potency, both metaphorically and actually. True personal agency and true phallic achievement, as with all of cultural and symbolic life, are predicated on a spatial foundation both real and metaphorical. An (in)ability to face the ultimate carnality of sexual symbols and to explicitly signify the female genital has consequences for free association as an encounter between the known and the novel, and for democratic free speech in the public sphere.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/00107530.2016.1101563<\/a><\/p>\n

Between the Familiar and the Stranger: Attachment Security, Mutual Desire, and Reclaimed Love<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The<\/em> International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology,\u00a0Vol. 11, No. 3, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

This essay explores the idea that relationships of attachment security are simultaneously relationships of mutual desire. Seen through this lens, separation and reunion behavior become increasingly psychologically charged: infant and mother, as well as patient and analyst, must revisit their willingness to expose their desire in each encounter. By recognizing that personal agency is vital to both healthy attachment and romantic desire, we can begin to appreciate the dawning of romantic desire not so much as promoting \u201cseparation-individuation\u201d as often conceived, but as exerting a gravitational pull to revisit an original love, one that is now erotically reconceived. We reclaim an original love but now in a relational context between mother and the other, the pre-oedipal and the oedipal, the familiar and the stranger.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/15551024.2016.1178039?journalCode=hpsp20<\/a><\/p>\n

The Erotically Reconceived Familiar Stranger: Reply to Ringstrom and Slavin<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology,\u00a0Vol. 11, No. 3, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

By viewing attachment theory in terms of its implicit semiotics of desire, we discover an avenue for reconciliation between attachment theory and contemporary psychoanalysis. My discussants, Ringstrom and Slavin, both affirm this quest, joining in articulating a dialectical conception of how attachment and desire, relationship and drive, mutually constitute each other. Ringstrom elaborates my thesis particularly in relation to his own signature theorizing on couples\u2019 treatment, and calls attention to the conundrum of insistent demand and the \u201cPandora\u2019s box\u201d of mutuality of desire. Slavin contextualizes my call within a larger existential framework, linking exploratory probings to mortal terrors. Both discussants highlight how high the stakes are in any genuine encounter between the known and the still unknown. Yet, by encompassing the erotics of the Oedipal triangle and its dialectics of the familiar-stranger, a more robust conception of attachment security emerges situated in a third space between drive and attachment, existential dread and relational connection, and desire and reunion, even as we discover their inextricable union.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/15551024.2016.1178043?journalCode=hpsp20<\/a><\/p>\n

Naming the Vagina, Naming the Woman<\/strong>
\n<\/em><\/h2>\n

Division\/Review,\u00a0No. 14, Spring 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

In this essay, I explore acts of\u00a0naming,<\/em>\u00a0their fundamental status for psychoanalysis, and the powerful effect that naming a hidden body part can have. I hope to show that once we are able to name and speak of the female genital it becomes metaphorically approachable, enabling free association and its expressive correlate, free speech.\u00a0Further, by metaphorizing the female genital, we also name\u00a0the woman<\/em>.\u00a0No longer\u00a0subjugated\u00a0as a condition of\u00a0the unsignifiable, she gains status in the symbolic realm\u00a0of shared discourse.\u00a0From this new vantage point, the female genital (in name and as metaphor), far from signifying lack or inferiority (as is so often suggested in the psychoanalytic literature), gains status as that primordial signifier for the entire project of human symbolization. The feminine metaphor marks the unknown, the as-yet-to-be-signified, and also the unsignifiable. Only by naming a \u201cfeminine law\u201d\u2014desire\u2019s law\u2014do we glimpse the primacy of space: the space that free speech requires.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> https:\/\/divisionreview.com<\/a><\/p>\n

Psychoanalysis: Relevant to Democracy<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The American Psychoanalyst,\u00a0Vol. 50, No. 1<\/em>,\u00a0Winter\/Spring 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

Psychoanalysis achieves its results through a definitively human, nontechnological practice of talking freely\u2014of\u00a0free association<\/em>. Its essential validity for a symbolic species is inherent in its design. In this profound mechanism, psychoanalysis\u2019s contributions to the democratic dream of shared, equal, and inclusive speech are real. Both psychoanalysis and democracy find mutual resonance, sustenance, and relevance in their signature practices, free association and free speech. But one point of departure is most intriguing: While psychoanalysis struggles to remain relevant to the culture at large, democracy\u2019s survival (despite sometimes striking bruises) seems assured; it claims an enduring relevance and comparative advantage over other forms of government. The sheer survival of the word \u201cdemocracy\u201d as a master signifier signifies its semiotic ascendancy, which both results from and validates (free) speech\u2019s democratizing action. Speech, as psychoanalysis reveals, illuminates the contagious, reverberating, and transformational flow of desire and its symbols. The therapeutic action of free association and free speech lies in liberating desire\u2019s democratic impulse.<\/p>\n

Link: http:\/\/www.apsa.org\/sites\/default\/files\/tap_vol50no1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"wwwsmallIARPPlogoGfx\"<\/h2>\n

Where Silent Infantile Sexuality Was, Democracy Shall Be:
\nA Psychoanalytic Manifesto<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Division\/Review,\u00a0No. 13, Winter 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

Sigmund Freud, after experimenting with hypnosis, began working instead in the familiar but also radical terrain of human speech, and wandered into uncanny territory. It wasn\u2019t only the unconscious that compelled his attention, but also the peculiar signage of unconscious terrain. He named this signage \u201cinfantile sexuality\u201d and he recognized it as both utterly normal and utterly perverse. But how was the infant\u2019s sexuality to be revealed? Infants, by definition, are without language (in-fantem<\/em>). What Freud intuited early on was the need for a space of speech and the power of an enlightened speaking subject. He glimpsed but never realized the power of psychoanalysis to grant human beings their natural and inalienable rights to own their sexuality, libido, and free speech privilege. The once meek\u2014and voiceless\u2014shall inherit the earth through a dedicated practice of speaking desire, of democratizing desire, a truly egalitarian model that Marx and the communist manifesto might wish to claim, with an equality (and nobility, according to Tocqueville) borne of translating the infant\u2019s mute sexual curiosity and natural \u201cperverse\u201d desire into a talking that cures.<\/p>\n

Link:<\/strong> https:\/\/divisionreview.com\/issues\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\"gentilephoto1115\"Jill Gentile, PhD
\n<\/strong>Faculty, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis
\nTraining and Supervising Analyst, Institute for the Psychoanalytic Study of Subjectivity
\n26 West 9th Street, Suite\u00a010A
\nNew York, NY\u00a010011
\n307 Raritan Avenue
\nHighland Park, NJ \u00a008904\u00a0 USA
\nEmail Jill Gentile
\n<\/a>Website: http:\/\/jillgentile.com<\/a><\/p>\n

\"eNews-div-lineNlogo\"Back to Top…<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

By Michael Eigen <\/strong>(USA)<\/p>\n

O, Orgasm and Beyond<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 25, No. 5, p. 646-654, 2015.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

In this article the author posits a distinction-union structure made up substructures veering more toward distinction (difference) and more toward union. Mixtures of these subtendencies open many experiential dimensions. Discussion includes Bion\u2019s O, Marion Milner\u2019s zero (pregnant emptiness), communion (co-union), scenes from Bion\u2019s A Memoir of the Future<\/em>, orgasmic thought, jouissance<\/em>, and a climactic orgasm-death scene in the Zohar. There are so many kinds of O-moments reaching beyond imaginings, opening one\u2019s heart to unknown intimacies.<\/p>\n

Link: <\/strong>http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/10481885.2015.1077665<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Just Beginning<\/strong><\/h2>\n

New Therapist,<\/em> November\/December 2015.<\/em><\/p>\n

Link: http:\/\/www.newtherapist.com\/back100to102.html<\/a><\/p>\n

\"eigenphoto0616w\"Michael Eigen, PhD
\n<\/strong>225 Central Park West, Apt. 101A
\nNew York, NY 10024\u00a0 USA
\nEmail Mike Eigen<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Janine de Peyer | Tom Wooldridge | Stanley Stern | Andrew Samuels | Jill Gentile | Michael Eigen<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":19,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"issuem_issue":[49],"issuem_issue_categories":[],"issuem_issue_tags":[],"class_list":["post-4622","article","type-article","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","issuem_issue-bookshelf-special-edition-august-2016"],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nArticle Announcements - IARPP<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Article Announcements - IARPP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Janine de Peyer | Tom Wooldridge | Stanley Stern | Andrew Samuels | Jill Gentile | Michael Eigen\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IARPP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-01T18:05:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/\",\"name\":\"Article Announcements - IARPP\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-30T17:33:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-01T18:05:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":265},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Articles\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Article Announcements\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/\",\"name\":\"IARPP\",\"description\":\"The International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Article Announcements - IARPP","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Article Announcements - IARPP","og_description":"Janine de Peyer | Tom Wooldridge | Stanley Stern | Andrew Samuels | Jill Gentile | Michael Eigen","og_url":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/","og_site_name":"IARPP","article_modified_time":"2016-08-01T18:05:13+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/","url":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/","name":"Article Announcements - IARPP","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg","datePublished":"2016-07-30T17:33:26+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-01T18:05:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/depeyerphoto0616w.jpg","width":200,"height":265},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/article-announcements\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Articles","item":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/article\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Article Announcements"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/#website","url":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/","name":"IARPP","description":"The International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4712,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4622\/revisions\/4712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue?post=4622"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_categories?post=4622"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iarpp.net\/thesite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_tags?post=4622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}