Rethinking the Group Leader's Interventions Addressing Diversity
Publication Announcement by Haim Weinberg (USA)
Weinberg, H. (2025). Rethinking the group leader’s interventions addressing diversity. In A.D. Abernethy [Ed.], Addressing Diversity Dynamics in Group Therapy. Routledge.
This chapter critically examines diversity dynamics in group psychotherapy, wherein existing power imbalances, particularly for individuals belonging to marginalized groups, can be perpetuated. It explores the challenges that marginalized individuals face in accessing and participating in groups, and how therapists can work towards creating more inclusive therapeutic spaces. Some of the new ideas about attending to racism and social justice in groups are examined, highlighting their differences from classical group work, which is overly influenced by white scholars, and seeking to integrate the two streams. The chapter discusses the limitations of existing literature, criticizes some of the common practices in leading groups intended to support marginalized populations, and highlights the need for further research on this topic. The final section includes a response to some of the major issues noted above by placing them in conversation with best practices in addressing cultural considerations in group therapy.
Facing the Dilemma of Forced Termination: What to Consider and Address When Removing a Member from a Group
Weinberg, H. & Adler, M. (2024). Facing the dilemma of forced termination: What to consider and address when removing a member from a group. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 74(4), 449–471.
The article explores a group leader’s considerations before removing a member from group sessions. The authors suggest that whenever a severe breach of the group agreement happens, especially continuously, and whenever it cannot be followed by exploration, reflection, and agreement by the group member who violated the agreement to make an effort to avoid repeating the event, the leader might consider removing the person from the group. The authors warn against too hasty a decision without consideration of the group-as-a-whole dynamics and the possibility of scapegoating, while also exploring the leader’s countertransference preventing him from considering the group’s best interest. The article distinguishes between removing a member in the early and later stages of the group. It also recommends how to explore this issue with the group and how to follow up with the removed member. Special attention is given to cases of racism, microaggressions, and trauma.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207284.2024.2420282
Haim Weinberg, Ph.D., CGP
Sacramento, California, USA
Email Haim Weinberg